Keyboard shortcuts

/ or ⌘/Ctrl K
Find a note
j / k
Next / previous section or linked note
h / l
Collapse or go to parent / expand or enter
e or Alt-click
Read a linked note here
o
Open focused note on its own
g g / G
First / last section or linked note
g h / g a
Home / all notes
g b / g t
Backlinks / table of contents
t
Cycle System, Light, Dark
? / Esc
Show / close this reference

Search: ↑/↓ or Ctrl N/P, Enter to open. Shortcuts pause while typing.

Marantz - What do linguists do? [0802ceef]

papers, languages/linguistics

  • Syntax is at the core of generative grammar
  • sentences of a language as a sequence of units that re-occur

    • can be sounds, roughly represented by words (letters as a semiotic of sounds)
    • what separates a word salad (sentence with no meaning) and a sentence with meaning?
    • are human languages finite state languages, aka those generated from finite state grammars? - chomsky

      • separators of phrases (commas and words) cannot be replaced without losing meaning, but we can insert additional phrases in between without losing original meaning
  • however, does chomsky operate on only made up sentences? We can infinitely nest variables and sentences, but does this map nicely back to human language?

    • which lends to a rules based analysis, but we can move beyond the rules based analysis and speakers can produce and understand sentences they haven't heard before

      • every finite corpus of setnences represents an accidental sampling of utterances
      • which means the rules can be used to project future sentences
  • do linguists largely predict data they don't have, based on rules they can't verify?
  • computational people vs linguists

    • "linguistic enterprise is about the knowledge of language that underlies everything that a speaker does with their language"
    • computational people typically have a very specific use case of language (e.g. parsing a web query)
  • anthropology vs linguistics

    • what is the relationship between culture and language?
    • marantz argues that the language itself is a bad lens to analyze culture

      • for Piraha by Everett, Marantz thinks that culutral constraints cannot explain behavior that strictly adheres to the constraints, a study of cultural constraints requires you to think on the boundaries and what transgresses the constraints
  • argues that lingusits are cognitive neuroscientists, who operate at many levels of abstractions