un and global governance lecture 14

sustaining peace
what capacities does the UN have to build resilance?
can local peacebuilders act autonomously?
“resiliance” is not a way to pawn off responsibility
varities of resilience
danger of the anglo-saxon approach is that “resilience” means nothing to locals
- has it been because of the global community’s international donor class?
- 5 schemas
  - governance from a distance
  - responsbilization
    - local communities have to do this themselves
  - role of the state is to intervene with market imperfections
    - market is the mover and shapers
    - market lead responses
  - market-lead enterprise
    - resilience as “resistence” as “robustness” in france and germany
  - humanitarian sphere
gaps in the international archiecture provid spaces that can be exploited
- jonathan joseph
- how much of this is rendering this legibile to a western audience?