fetishization of doctrine

Jihad/security studies tends to fetishize doctrine
- we take these orientialist views because we view these things as foriegn
- these people adopt a different universalism, therefore we view it from first principals rather than viewing as a social element
- why do we adopt a sociological view of ourselves but doctrine based of others?
is fiqh the correct mode of analysis? can everything be read through fiqh?
islamic financing
- we should look at the social elements of it
- less studied because of relatively curious nature of it
Talal asad
UN peacekeeping fetishization on rote practice of human rights and protection of civilians without teaching it

What is doctrine? What are the correct universalities? Is there a universality?