effectiveness of scaling data and its relationship to anthropology questions

Why do anthropology people care about questions so much?
why not the patterns in the code?
why “more is different”
- “More Is Different” 177 (1972): 4.
human related sciences have stopped themselves from having simple solutions, but we should not mistake that for no solution
almost weissenshaft like, where we believe that with enough comptuation, most of these problems are solvable
Halevy, Alon, Peter Norvig, and Fernando Pereira. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 24, no. 2 (March 2009): 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2009.36.
data even without questions can provide you answers, and even more so, it can provide you actual questions
on digital humanities programs - to me digital humanities programs are butterfly collecting, but we can scale to very large
obsession with “conversations” and “questions” is largely due to academia incentives, not real answers
- engaging in knowledge sectarianism in some senses if you define this as a way of carving up knowledge
moore’s law, econometrics