computational linguistics
Tags: languages/linguistics
- two possible motivations for research
- technological: best performance on some applied task
- cognitive: single model with human-like performance across a broad range of abilities, plus biological/cognitive plausibility
- what does success look like?
- most nlu takes a behavioral approach, a modelis assumed to learn/understand iff
- can perform the task
- on data that wasn’t used to build/train it
- (possibly) makes errors and uses resources similarily to humans
- note that this sets aside the question of “what is understanding”, “what/when does conciousness emerge”, etc
- most nlu takes a behavioral approach, a modelis assumed to learn/understand iff
- what is the background for nlu need?
-
two main questions:
- how much does a system need?
- how much can it learn from data, how much built-in knowledge does it need?
-
one big trend is that learning from the data is actually better than building explicit knowledge
Every time I fire a linguist, the performance of the speech recongizer goes up - apocryphal, Fred Jelinek, 1988
-
relates to are experts real?
-