Claude: Collective Security as an Approach to Peace
Tags: papers, un and global governance lecture 1
Inis L. Claude Jr. “Collective Security as an Approach to Peace.” Accessed February 2, 2021.
- Collective security is a halfway point between anarchy and world governement
- talks about how collective security has become a bandied about term, but means something completely different
The achievement of orthodox status is very often fatal to the integreity of a concept
- “collective security” began as a specialized term, initially meant to hamstring aggressions
- now has largely lost its meaning, appropriated for any & all approaches to collective actions that build peace and order, synonym for world peace
- collective security should be defined as “a second line of defense against wars where settlement should but does not prevent a war”
- assumptions: wars are likely to occur and most can be prevented
- about forestalling the arbitrary & aggresive use of force
- constract with pacific security
- pacific security - moral ambiguity, uses tools like investigating, reconciliation, arbitration, etc
- collective security - moral clarity, uses diplomatic, economic, and military sanctions
subjective requirements on collective security
- aggression in one part of the world is not localized, things can easily spread
- people & states must recongize their interests align with the international
- demands that many national loyalities become harmonized
- is this similar to how domestic institutions ahve aligned with Barnett et al: International Organizations and the Diffusions of Power?
- demands that many national loyalities become harmonized
- fundalmentally requires the state to give up very much
- control of military
- follow rulebook adherence to international order
- runs against the instincts of statement and politicians
- collective security is meant to be used against any state, anonomous aggressors and anonomyous victims
- states must be confidence in collective security, or else the whole thing falls apart
objective requirements
- power: requires several great powers of equal strength
- membership: must be universal, assumes any state may become aggressor
- proposes that the preponderance of power be available to any state
- aims for the organization of police action, requires a world where every state is caught in and dependent on one other
- requires large scale disarmament and lack of economic self sufficiency